Companies linked to the property magnates Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz have filed creditors’ claims against the Icelandic bank Kaupthing. The entrepreneurs lost a substantial part of their wealth when the bank suddenly collapsed in October 2008.
In summer 2008 Robert Tchenguiz, one of the UK’s major investors, whose business was controlled by British Virgin Islands- and Cayman Islands-registered family trusts, had borrowed €1.7 billion from the bank, while his brother’s loans in the bank amounted to €208.7 million. Robert Tchenguiz also was on the board of an investment company Exista, which was one of the bank’s largest shareholders. Then, the bank’s winding-up committee sued one of companies linked to the businessman for an unpaid overdraft of £643 million, and also attempted to seize proceeds from its sale of stake in the supermarket Somerfield. Also, due to the bank’s efforts Robert Tchenguiz was forced to sell his positions in the pubs group Mitchells & Butlers and the supermarket chain J Sainsbury, and lost hundreds of millions of pounds.
Now, probably as an answer to the bank, two offshore companies linked to the brothers – British Virgin Islands-registered Euro Investments Overseas, and Investec Trust, based in Guernsey, have submitted separate claims against the bank saying they are creditors, and the bank owes them money. The claim of Vincent Tchenguiz amounting to £1.65bn, and the claim of Robert Tchuenguiz (£650m) together make more than 5 per cent of the total submissions to the bank.
The claims of the brothers probably will be contested by the bank’s winding-up committee but their validity is not likely to be examined until after creditor’s meeting which is planned on this week. If the claims are not successful, the BVI and Guernsey companies could challenge the decision in the court, or sue the bank in a separate legal challenge.
The exact details of the claims are not known, it is suggested only that they could be based on allegations that there were serious problems at the Icelandic bank before it failed. They said that this invalidated their contracts ad caused them financial damage (consequential loss).